improvised theatre

February 16, 2005

Unflattering

Something exciting has happened to the front page of the Uncertainty Division website and I think it's fair to assume that James Aylett has been getting all photoshoppy.

James has clearly decided to combine photographs which he feels illustrate exactly how uncertain the outcome of our improvised narratives can be. As a montage I would say that it does this very effectively, but it has the unfortunate side-effect of prominently displaying a particularly unflattering photograph of myself, tea-towel on my head and Ali Glennon in my mouth.

Visitors to our website may be surprised to learn that I am actually not unattractive to look at - indeed, in the last fortnight alone I have had not one but two text messages from people I didn't know telling me they thought I was "cute"/"fit". (Anyone wishing to know the outcome of said text messages can email me privately.) (And does anybody know who has been making free with my phone number?)

But glancing through the photographs from last year's show, it is evident that none of them were taken to showcase my looks. Perhaps I did too many comedy facial expressions, because generally I look much more like a character actor (specialising in Dickensian grotesques) than a young male lead.

Then again, nobody comes off particularly well in those photos. The pictures of Phil Stott are a veritable collage of different ways to gurn; for a man of great bearded gravitas, Andrew Ormerod comes out of many of his photos looking extremely silly; and in one picture, Ali Glennon doesn't have any eyes.

In fact, the only person who comes out mostly unscathed is James Aylett himself. History, as they say, is written by the winners. Or in the 21st century, by the people who run the websites.

Posted by James Lark at February 16, 2005 12:01 PM
Comments

I think Andrew Ormerod pulls off "deep and serious" with great gusto. And Andrew Pontzen does a good line in "mysterious".

There are other photos which will appear at some point, but sadly almost all of those with Phil have him doing a silly face - be it that of a platypus, that of a tortured Man Ghost, or that of a man forced to marry me. For an explanation as to why we have no other photos of Mr Stott, we may have to turn to our photographer ...

Posted by: James Aylett at February 16, 2005 12:20 PM

I can't comment on individual cases, but please imagine I've made some kind of politic generalisation to avoid jeopardising my artistic integrity.

Anyway, no-one wants to see a load of good-looking, straight-faced people in carefully studied and uncompromising poses. If we did, we'd all watch Tom Cruise films.

Posted by: Mary at February 16, 2005 02:33 PM

Am i the only one who finds the image of Andrew O (in cheeky mode) looming, giant-like over the rest of the company a weeny bit disturbing?

Posted by: Susie at February 16, 2005 05:27 PM

oh lordy, perhaps the reason that no-one else finds it disturbing is because it keeps changing. like magic.

Posted by: Susie at February 16, 2005 05:32 PM